Skip to main content

Law of Compensation

In his essay, Compensation, Ralph Waldo Emerson says that in every part of nature, we discover polarity, or, action and reaction. We find this duality in, “darkness and light; in heat and cold; in the ebb and flow of waters; in male and female; in the inspiration and expiration of plants and animals,” etc. A dualism, says Emerson, bisects nature, “so that each thing is a half, and suggests another thing to make it whole; as spirit, matter; man, woman; subjective, objective, in out; upper, under; motion, rest; yea, nay.”

Nature, says Emerson, hates one-sided monopolies. Echoing the insights of Lao Tzu, he says that nature always strives towards balance. For example, look at the sea. No matter how high the waves might toss, they must always come back to sea level. Emerson believed that this tendency towards balance and equilibrium is an inevitable law of the universe, which he called, The Law of Compensation. 

Human beings as products of nature, are every bit as subject to this law as anything else. While our proverbs attest to our awareness of it, (“Tit for tat; and eye for an eye; give and it shall be given; etc) we often act otherwise. We seek the sweet without the sour. We feast without fasting. We gain but fail to give. According to Emerson, this failure to abide by the Law of Compensation is a perilous mistake, for every advantage has a tax: 

For every benefit you receive, a tax is levied. He is great who confers the most benefits. He is base, - and that is the one base thing in the universe, - to receive favors, and render none In the order of nature we cannot render benefits to those from who we receive them, or only seldom. But the benefit we receive must be rendered again, line for line, deed for deed, cent for cent, to somebody. Beware of too much good staying in your hand. It will fast corrupt and worm worms. Pay it away quickly of some sort.

Native American tribes knew this law instinctually. Many tribes who lived in the Great Plains for instance, after taking the life of a buffalo during a hunt, would offer prayers and rituals in retribution for their kill. They believed that without these rituals, the buffalo may not come back. Northwest Indians demonstrated an awareness of this law in their potlatch celebrations. The Potlatch is a gift-giving feast where a kin group gives away great wealth to neighbors. What is fascinating about this custom is that every present received at a potlatch has to be returned at another potlatch. A man who would not give his potlatch feast in due time would be considered as not paying his debts.

Emerson believed so strongly in the Law of Compensation that near the end of the essay he writes: “I no longer wish to meet a good I do not earn - for example, to find a pot of buried gold - knowing that it brings with it new responsibility. I do not wish more external goods…[because while] the gain is apparent, the tax is certain.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How the “Trump Show” beat “Hamilton the Musical”

At least among my Facebook friends, pretty much everyone has applauded the Hamilton crowd and cast for taking a stand against the insensitivity of the future Trump/Pence administration. While I certainly agree with the sentiments offered by Brandon Victor Dixen concerning the importance of protecting the rights of America’s diverse population, I think that the left just fell into a trap. Why? How? Trump is a master of the media. And as such, he is a master of distraction. The greatest weapon in Donald Trump's arsenal is the creation of diversion. One need only to look back these past few months to see countless examples of how Trump has altered the narrative. For instance, in the Republican primary, whenever his own insufficiencies in terms of policy were thrown into question, he would change the narrative through name calling - e.g. “Low Energy,” “Lying Ted,” “Little Marco,” his attack on Meghan Kelly, etc. - or through taking absurdly far-out policy positions - e.g. Muslim ...

The Violence of Identity Politics

Marshall McLuhan once said that,”Violence is a quest for identity.” I find "myself," or a group finds "itself," through confrontation with another. It follows, that when a person, group or people, feels that their identity is being threatened, they lash out in violence. Violence here is really all about the creation of boundaries. We act violently in order to establish some clear demarkation between ourselves and the “other.” All of this seems to have something to do with human development. Watch, for instance, how small children, as they emerge from unconscious identification with the mother, to a gradual sense of individuality, enjoying hitting and striking. It’s as if they are trying to get clear as to where the boundaries are between self and world. Identity therefore, is always a matter of finding oneself through another. In terms of politics and history, “whiteness” is a relatively recent invention. In Europe for instance, there have been innumerable wa...